Comment on It's sad that people completely misunderstand what Star Trek is about.
JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago“Nuh uh” isn’t an argument. If you won’t read the comment then I won’t be able to give you a meaningful reply.
Comment on It's sad that people completely misunderstand what Star Trek is about.
JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago“Nuh uh” isn’t an argument. If you won’t read the comment then I won’t be able to give you a meaningful reply.
Kirk@startrek.website 4 hours ago
Your examples provided made no mention of “forced inclusion” or what makes it different from regular inclusion.
JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term “forced inclusion,” which I didn’t raise. You did. I can’t reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you.
Kirk@startrek.website 4 hours ago
…this you?
Image
The part that confuses me is what “forced inclusion” means and what makes it different from regular inclusion.
JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
Yes, in response to this comment.
I didn’t raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion?