Comment on Robots will solve wealth inequality, they say
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 week agoIt requires truly abandoning the idea that one must work for one’s pay. That basic assumption has to completely die before you can enter that world of technological post-scarcity. I don’t think that reckoning is going to arrive peacefully.
SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 week ago
IMO, the United States is speedrunning the conditions needed to upset the apple cart. As such, much of my focus when making suggestions is the assumption that society would have a serious redefinition of how the economy is supposed to work.
To that end, I think UBI socialism could pair with capitalism, but in specific ways. UBI providing free necessities, while capitalism offers luxuries. For example, UBI allowing anyone to own a single generic car in one color, with a set feature list. Luxury cars have to compete against the free basic government car, by offering creature comforts, aesthetics, size, and so forth.
IMO, capitalism is great at offering interesting stuff for a person. But it is fundamentally is unfit at ensuring the wellbeing of people. Money should be used solely used for buying lifestyle, while everything fundamental to a decent life is freely given. Free fuel, free food, free basic lodgings, free utilities, free healthcare, free basic supplies, free childcare, free generic clothing, ect.
It is the bandages decorated with children’s cartoons, fashionable clothing, fancy christmas lights, and so forth that people have to spend money on.