Comment on Wikipedia has banned AI-generated text, with two exceptions

• Warl0k3@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  What? spelling/grammar checking and machine translation have been in use for decades on wikipedia, the only difference is that AI has improved the usefulness of the tools for first-pass editing. After generating videos of young girls with gigantic titties it’s the only thing generative AI is actually useful for.

  source

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I still think it should be banned. It’s prone to just making shit up. Therefore, it’s not useful for any sort of professional work. If you had just a guy named Al, who would work for free, but sometimes would just make stuff up to make you happy, would you let Al work on important things?

    source

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Yeah, but that tendency is directly addressed in the policy.

      source