Comment on Federal Cyber Experts Thought Microsoft’s Cloud Was “a Pile of Shit.” They Approved It Anyway.
atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks agoBelieve it or not I pay attention to usernames. I was talking about the link you just posted that mentions the liability assumed by the signers of the BAA.
Maybe read it again? My job requires me to be HIPAA and FERPA certified, I am confident in my interpretation of the situation.
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
I’m also required to be compliant.
But how can companies like google have products like
https://cloud.google.com/security/compliance/hipaa
if cloud storage is a violation?
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
That’s what he’s saying, they’re in violation. Your comment begs the question “is everything big companies do legal and compliant?”
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Violation of what specifically?
Because HIPAA does not say you cant store data with third parties. That would be every cloud EMR out there.
That’s my point though. Is HIPAA says nothing technical about who can store data, just who’s responsible for it getting out.
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Yes we get your point, you dont get the point that it leaves them liable to regulators defining it and finding themselves out of compliance with the yet to be defined rules
atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Seriously, stop being a troll. I’m done with this conversation. Not one time have I used the word violation.