Potentially could be used for things like spreading flame-retardent powder for putting out a wildfire or similar with more precision. Would also remove the risk of a human life in firefighting so areas might be cleared quicker.
frongt@lemmy.zip 18 hours ago
Neat. I wonder if there is anything you can use as a warhead without it becoming a destructive device. Chalk rounds?
I’m also curious to know the rocket velocity compared to actual MANPADS. I’ll have to watch the videos later because I’m also curious about whether they’re independent or require the launching laptop to stay connected.
Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 hours ago
IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Already behind the times on that: arstechnica.com/…/firefighting-drones-head-to-asp…
Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 hours ago
Cheers then, add this to the “arsenal”.
frongt@lemmy.zip 12 hours ago
I don’t see a lot of info on payload in that article. Forest fires are big. You’d need an enormous fleet of drones to be effective.
Samskara@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
Velocity and range are also my main questions, as well as tracking quality and speed. The video doesn’t demonstrate it hitting a flying target.
Common MANPADS like Stinger, Strela, etc. use infrared tracking. The seekers are high performance and fast but need complex supercooling with gas. Using a MANPADS you only have seconds, to arm, aim and track, then fire the missile against a fast moving target before it‘s out of range. These can hit low flying supersonic jets.
Still this project is very impressive and hints at the possibility to build cheap low end MANPADS that can target slow moving strike and observation drones, maybe helicopters.
It’s another indicator, that mass produced cheap precision weapons are a major trend in warfare.