Comment on Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash

• wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  The fuck you talking about.

  Using a tool with billions of dollars behind it robinhood?

  How is stealing open source prihcets code regardless of license stealing fr corporation’s?

  source

  • lung@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    • he’s not anthropic, and doesn’t have billions of dollars
    • stealing from open source is not stealing, it’s "free as in speech"
    • the argument above is that these models are allegedly trained “regardless of license” i.e. implying they are trained on non-oss code

    source

    • wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      1) he’s using a tool that took billions in funding.

      2) that’s not how open source licensing work.

      3) no, I’m saying some licneses restrict LLM usage in the form of derivative work must also be licensed under the same license. Using that work as a starting point requires you to also open that portion of code.

      side note:

      https://www.securityweek.com/github-copilot-chat-flaw-leaked-data-from-private-repositories/

      why does AI have access to private code?

      source