You are right, actually. I blindly trusted the computer to figure this one out, but just looking at it I found a better solution by hand. Maybe there really are some better solutions for the 22 monitors problem.
spoiler
Image
This better not end up in any scientific papers, ever.
To answer your question: fitting more monitors into these gaps would not result in the optimal placement for that amount of monitors. 23, 24, and 25 monitors all have “expected” results.
lemmyartistforhire@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Here you go. 22 16:9 monitors.
Image
ulterno@programming.dev 1 month ago
So what’s that gap for?
You can clearly either fit a few more, or make the total area smaller.
lemmyartistforhire@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You are right, actually. I blindly trusted the computer to figure this one out, but just looking at it I found a better solution by hand. Maybe there really are some better solutions for the 22 monitors problem.
spoiler
Image This better not end up in any scientific papers, ever.
To answer your question: fitting more monitors into these gaps would not result in the optimal placement for that amount of monitors. 23, 24, and 25 monitors all have “expected” results.