Comment on Historic Chat Control Vote in the EU Parliament: MEPs Vote to End Untargeted Mass Scanning of Private Chats

• Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  That “trojan horse” is nothing but a paper tiger since age control will be managed in a completely privacy-friendly way. It is a non-issue. So that is why it is being “overlooked”

  The check will send nothing more than a yes/no verification, and no other forms of identification.

  And the information will be managed by a governmental institute that already has all that information.

  source

  • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    sorry but you are so naive

    source
  • hector@lemmy.today ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Jesus christ, you are a mark for some con artist with your naivety, no offense bro. Ha.

    source

    • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      If you can’t understand the technology behind it, please refrain from calling other people names. It makes you look ignorant.

      The EU is very privacy focused, as should be apparent with the post you are literally commenting on.

      Your russian propaganda holds no power here. It didn’t work with chat control, and it won’t work with age verification either.

      source

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        If you can’t understand the technology behind it

        it seems it is you, that have no idea how technology works. “open source” won’t solve being able to prove it does not send anything more it needs, when the implementations will be black boxes, with obfuscated verification software as is recommended by guidelines governmental projects intend to follow, as you can see in this very long thread

        additionally, when the laws are accepted, what will you do if the promises turn out to be lies? protest by not using the internet anymore?

        source
      • hector@lemmy.today ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        gtfo. We all know what age control is in reality. You are playing us, for the oligarchy. Admit it!

        source