Cutting services as opposed to complyimg is the better approach, since the other is a endorsement of it without consequences for regions putting it in place.
Comment on MidnightBSD Bans Users in Brazil and California, Warns More Regions Could Follow
pfr@piefed.social 1 month ago
Personally, I don’t think this is the answer. Like, I get it, and it’s a sure way to avoid having to deal with all this bs. But at the end of the day, the only people who suffer from this decision are the end users. It’s punishing them for something their government has implemented. Doesn’t seem right to me.
Lfrith@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
pfr@piefed.social 1 month ago
There is already the option of non compliance.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 month ago
An important thing to understand here is that in America, the people have the power over their government. The people of California are responsible for putting the people who did this in power, and it’s their responsibility for getting them out again.
pfr@piefed.social 1 month ago
This is now in many countries, not just the US
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I can only speak on America
tty84@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
It is not up to the developer community to take responsibility for the stupid decisions made by their government.
People get the leaders they deserve.
pfr@piefed.social 1 month ago
Sadly, they often do not.