Comment on New ntfy.sh v2.18.0 was written by AI

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• NoFun4You@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Like ppl thinking skilled engineers cannot vet AI output. AI is pretty good for programming.

  source

  • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I have a few decades programming experience, as a professional software engineer, an open source developer, and a DevOps engineer. There is no way in hell I would do a code review where 15k lines were added and a similar amount of lines removed without having a long discussion with the person who made those changes. I’d want to ask a lot of detailed questions about the changes, questions that an LLM isn’t likely to answer, and most definitely not questions I’d be inclined to try to type into an LLM to try to get an answer.

    Over the years I’ve dealt with all manner of bugs, from overflows & underflows, to bad assumptions about logic flow, and much much more. The whole purpose of pointed questioning of the author is to be comfortable with decisions made in the code and to minimize the chances of all sorts of potential bugs.

    source

    • NoFun4You@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I think it largely depends on what you’re building. You’re not gonna get what you’ve got over there over night with a few giant prompts.

      source
  • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    And yet there are cases like the Huntarr debacle, where the dev simply thought “and make sure your code complies with best security practices” to their vibe code prompts actually made it secure.

    They added 14k lines of code in a week, and ripped out 10k lines of existing code. That’s not something that a skilled programmer can reasonably vet in that amount of time. This is showing all the signs of AI slop, and none of the signs of debugged or vetted code.

    source

    • NoFun4You@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      That’s a bit extreme

      source
  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    It’s not. That’s the problem. It actually sucks ass. It’s super low quality for anything more complex they s very simple CRUD app or a simple function. I say this as someone who s a heavy LLM user. It’s just bad code. It makes all kinds of simple mistakes. Just because code compiles doesn’t mean it’s good or does what you need it to do

    source

    • NoFun4You@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I think it largely depends on what you’re building. You’re not gonna get build a company overnight with a few prompts but it’s much more powerful than you’ve described.

      source

      • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        It’s really not though. If you think it is I really suggest to re-think your perspective on what maintainable shippable code looks like. It’s basically automating copying from stack overflow. There’s so many little considerations that come into development.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Ohi@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    You’re absolutely right, and the vast majority of people on this platform seem to get offended by anything AI related. Software engineers have been reviewing code made by other people since the dawn of the craft. Guess what y’all, AI generated code looks exactly the same, if not better on the first pass at creating a thing.

    Down vote me all you want homies. You’re living in a fantasy if you think all AI is slop. Sure, I can see how it’s ruining some content on the Internet, but for code related tasks, its going to dramatically change the world for the better.

    source

    • NoFun4You@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Ppl are fucked lol, I’m over here writing a lot of stuff with AI, maybe it’s not always perfect but nothing ever is, and without iteration or dedication to the craft you’re just gonna sit there be all upset and judgy because you’ve never seen it lol

      source