I think you may be falling into a false dichotomy. Not only is the choice being presented a bad one, it ignores real solutions to the root problem, leaving us to argue over the crappy “band-aid” solution to it.
I believe that people needing health care should have no reason to ask a chat bot about their symptoms because they can ask a helpful doctor instead. The fact that they can’t do that is the problem, not their access or lack of it to the chat bot.
Soup@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
“Would rather have disabled people with cancer suffer and die…”
My guy, that’s not a lack of LLM access, it’s a completely fucked US healthcare system that forces people onto the internet because they can’t get what they need from the state, you goofy-ass weirdo.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
chatbots are shit doctors.
douglasg14b@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Well yes of course but also restricting access to information doesn’t exactly help much either.
Soup@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Do hallucinating LLMs, that have done such things as convince a child to commit suicide before, really count as “information machines”? The Mayo clinic website might take a single whole other braincell to read through but at least it’ll be written properly.
I mean, the fact that you consider these programs to have enough credibility to be called “information machines” is exactly why they’re so potentially dangerous.
SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I hate to break it to you but… they’re not really “information machines”. Google search is a better information machine.