Comment on Uploading Pirated Books via BitTorrent Qualifies as Fair Use, Meta Argues

• Grimy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  To be fair, I did say inherently part of. It would have been rude of them not to seed.

  source

  • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Those bastards stole all our data! But hey, at least they seeded it. Would have been pretty darn rude, otherwise.

    source

    • architect@thelemmy.club ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      It’s not stealing to download media.

      We can hate zuckerberg and still not care that the torrented books.

      source

      • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        I hear you, but hear me out… They’re creating products from the consumed torrents, which absolutely contained copyrighted materials. I’m not trying to capitalize my torrents. Although, I did use cracked photoshop back in high school for a $200 job.

        And to be completely honest with you, I don’t really care about copyright infringement so much, after it’s become a tool for organizations like Disney or whoever to abuse as they please. But the main body of work torrented here would be corpus’ of text, music, … a lot of stuff that independent producers created and rely on for income.

        I found this particular video quite insightful on the impact within the music industry: youtu.be/QVXfcIb3OKo

        To be fair to Meta, I’d have to say that I don’t really know what models they’re training via that data and how they’re using the resulting products. This is Meta, though, a pioneer and industry leader in the process of surveillance capitalism. I don’t particularly have high expectations for them.

        source
    • Grimy@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I’m not pro-copyright. I actually steal content, as in pirate it and then watch it. I don’t consider it stealing to train AI on it.

      “Our” data implies we collectively own it, yet we don’t, copyright companies for the most part do.

      source