Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoI’m not qualified to design the prompts and home users can’t really pile in 3 million+ documents.
Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoI’m not qualified to design the prompts and home users can’t really pile in 3 million+ documents.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Prompts are in the appendix: arxiv.org/abs/2602.16800
I don’t know how far you get on the free tier but it should be at least enough for a proof of principle; to get other people to chip in. You didn’t have qualms demanding other people should do this for free.
Mind that this is a serious GDPR violation in Europe. So there will be serious pressure on AI companies to prevent this kind of use.
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Seriously, I’m not qualified. No amount of appendix prompts and Dunning Kruger is going to change that.
I’m not demanding anything. I’m suggesting that AI can’t do what is claimed or that people with something to prove are not interested in proving something.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
You think the paper is fraud?
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
My statement that I’m quoting predates this paper. My statement exists completely independent of this paper ever being produced. My statement is not about this paper. My statement is about the state of AI and the industry. This paper reinforces my statement.