Comment on Ars Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotes
Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 month agoI have yet to see a field where LLMs are a net positive. At best scammers can dupe people easier and faster than ever but between writing, programming, etc the avg productivity gain is typically negligible at best to achieve work of similar quality with or without LLMs.
themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
It is useful in some specific fields like protein folding:
www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03819-2
The problem is people think it can replace people which is wrong, it is a tool and should be used as such not as a replacement.
Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Those aren’t LLMs.
themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Oh your right my mistake. I guess unit testing and debugging are useful. I did use copilot to find a missing slash. Also useful for revising email and paragraphs, of course you have to review it. It also should never be used for scientific research and journalism.