Comment on The Pentagon’s Claude Use in Iran Is a Reminder that Anthropic Never Objected to Military Use
XLE@piefed.social 2 days agoYou said Anthropic didn’t want to develop autonomous weapons. Anthropic contradicts you. They do want to develop them.
Can you acknowledge this fact?
threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
You have a point, but perhaps try a softer tone next time. I think that would help your argument.
0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
They’re building tools to <cull people and children> from half way across the world and you’re worried about the tone?
Serinus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s not a very solid point. They said they may become necessary at some point, but right now they’re irresponsible.
They’re not ruling it out in the future, but their focus is on today’s problem.
XLE@piefed.social 1 day ago
Serinus, did you see the part where Anthropic wants to develop them with the US military?
Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Said safeguards being that their technology isn’t being used for mass surveillance or the development of autonomous drones. It’s explicitly mentioned in their statement - the one you’re desperately trying to massage and misquote to make it seem like they’re saying something they’re not - yet anyone can just go and read it themselves.