Comment on ..?

• WereHacker@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

  That’s the thing, how would I know if I am tankie, if I don’t have a clear definition. If it is defined by wether or not I am oppossed to military moving into Budapest 70 years ago. I am probably not a tankie, but I say probably, because everyone writing about seem so biased I find it difficult to see the truth of it. But my moral compass tells me it is always wrong to use military against civilians. Always.

  source

  • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

    At the end of the day the deeds define the word, not the other way around. Not everyone will use the word correctly or appropriately. It’s why only you yourself can truly categorize as such, but at that point you must come to terms with what that means, positively or negatively.

    The bias thing is a real problem, but also sometimes not. It all depends on the context. Some people with unreasonable opinions will absolutely waste your time by never accepting difficult realities and talking around it, so identifying a mindset that’s immune to self reflection can be useful. But similarly if a label is all that’s needed to dismiss an opinion also is not very reasonable.

    source

    • WereHacker@lemmy.ml ⁨57⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

      There is another problem. People use slurs to derail the discussions. Calling people “libs” or “tankies” left, right and center removes focus from whatever is discussed and make people crawl into their foxholes. It is an easy way to devalue people’s opinions or simply derail discussions. I think I will keep on questioning when people use the word “tankie”, because once the word is on the table, the discussion has already been derailed one way or another. And maybe one day it will lead to better discourse.

      source
  • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

    Are you in some way pro Putin, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Kim ? Then you might be a tankie.

    If you think they are/were despicable mass-murderous dictators then you’re not.

    source