I only believe in my own wifi. My wifi is the one true wifi.
Comment on big facts
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 5 hours agoIf you don’t believe wi-fi exists, you’d be a fool.
Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Comment on big facts
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 5 hours agoIf you don’t believe wi-fi exists, you’d be a fool.
I only believe in my own wifi. My wifi is the one true wifi.
lime@feddit.nu 5 hours ago
i don’t believe in wifi, just like i don’t believe in trees. i know they’re there.
cynar@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
The belief would be that your senses aren’t being actively deceived. Also, that you’re not a Boltzmann brain hallucinating in the void.
I personally believe all the axioms of science apply. It’s still fun to poke at them.
lime@feddit.nu 4 hours ago
the atheist says “i will not believe”. the agnostic says “i can not believe”. one is as dogmatic as the beliefs they purport to refute, the other lacks the capacity for dogma, as belief for them is simply not possible.
MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 1 hour ago
I’m willing to accept Atheism, ‘I do not believe in God’, as somewhat dogmatic, but as others have said, it’s the null hypothesis and they have Occam’s razor going for them. Pragmatically it is a useful stance in light of the societal harm religion does.
I am however unwilling to conflate Agnosticism with ‘I can not believe’, always been “I’m waiting for evidence one way or the other” to me, so perhaps the more scientific point of view.
cynar@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Belief in a null is a lot more reasonable than belief in something so powerful it can pretend to be a null.
Belief that I am not in a Truman show like environment is a lot more reasonable (without evidence) than belief that I am in a Truman show, and they are doing a perfect job.
That doesn’t mean I don’t try disproving the null hypothesis.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 5 hours ago
Oh, you’re a solipsist? You believe reality is an illusion and trees don’t really exist? I’m somewhat similar, I’m an antirealist. I recognise that reality is an illusion, but I still choose to believe in it until it can be overthrown. If we teach enough people how to reshape their beliefs and perceptions, then we can decide for ourselves whether trees exist. But at present, I need to believe in trees in order to inhabit consensus reality and communicate efficiently with the people who live here. It’s cool that you don’t believe in trees, though!
lime@feddit.nu 5 hours ago
no