Comment

Comment on MULTIVERSE has defederated fedinsfw.app for hosting child pornography

Robbo@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

There’s an interesting discussion to be had around stuff like the fauxbait community. But if you approach it in such bad faith as screaming “CP!! CP!!!” it just comes across as ragebaiting to try to invoke the same sort of “but think of the children!” arguments that we’ve seen so much of in governments recently.

Look, that sort of content isn’t to my taste but I will defend its right to exist. It’s legal. The people posted there are adults. There has always been a thriving category of “barely legal” content - look at reddit’s “legalteens” or pornhub’s constant barrage of “18 year old does this” and “barely legal does that” etc. You can look elsewhere if it’s not to your taste but you can’t deny that it’s legal content.

I agree with the others about needing a clear distinction between what is legal and what isn’t, and we can debate all day about whether 18 is the correct line to draw, but for now you can’t call posting 18 year olds and 21 year olds “child porn” just because they have small bodies. That is approaching the discussion in bad faith.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Petter1nsfw@reddthat.com ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
The thing is, that such laws are not global

In some places only material that has hurt children is illegal (even ai gen legal if no CP was used in training) In others it is about the age of the person in the picture including fantasy characters (looking adult but being child - illegal, looking like a child but “250 years old - legal) In others like apparently Australia, it is illegal as soon a someone watching the picture may think the person on the picture is underage

And of course there are many more versions making it difficult to comply for all (some countries eveb have banned porn entirely)

source
Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
It’s not even distasteful, it’s simply honest. It is no secret that many men like young women, or else the “barely legal” category wouldn’t exist, and this theme is even completely in the open when the US Republicans push for lowering the legal age for marriage.

This exists in nearly every society, from the western “barely legal” porn theme over Mohammed having child wifes to japanese mangas which sexualize schoolgirls. It is therefor important to acknowledge that these impulses exist, make sure children are protected by law and to have a societal understanding that children are harmed if those impulses are made reality.

Those who suffer from having those impulses need ways to cope so that children are safe - either by offering therapy, “barely legal"-porn or “fauxbait”, without ostracizing those who choose these things over harming children. If a different label for the same thing helps to even keep one child safe it’s worth it. That would be a responsible way to deal with this situation.

It’s similar to those having a bad temper and aggressive impulses - giving those people an “out” by offering therapy, from competitive settings where they can live out their impulses (which can be anything from sports over video games to board games) to hitting each other with pool noodles and going into the woods to scream until their throats hurt.

All of it is simply channeling destructive impulses into non-harmful ways to cope, and only an open and honest discourse will help.

source