Comment on There's another NSFW instance

• lemmyposter212@fedinsfw.app ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I definitely think you are misinterpreting the community. It’s not my favorite community on the site but it doesn’t break any rules, everyone posted id 18+ and it a post is even remotely questionable it’s removed.

  source

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You should add a rule against fake pedo porn.

    source
  • dr_robotBones@reddthat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Then the rules need to change

    source
• IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  OK that’s a definite instance block. “Pedophilia doesn’t break the rules,” like motherfucker, that makes you just as bad.

  source

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You realize that isn’t at all what is happening, right?

    source
  • Nastybutler@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    That’s literally the opposite of what was said.

    source

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Pedophilia is sexual attraction for children, and the community is for people who are sexually attracted to children. It’s full of fake child porn for pedophiles to masturbate to. @lemmyposter212@fedinsfw.app is making the distinction that real child porn is against the rules, but fake child porn for pedophiles to masturbate to is not. @introvertturtle@lemmy.zip is saying it’s disgusting that wanting to look at child porn is allowed, regardless of whether the child porn is real or fake.

      Those two statements look contradictory because you’re conflating pedophilia with child abuse. There’s no child abuse in the community, but there’s plenty of pedophilia.

      source

      • lemmyposter212@fedinsfw.app ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Calling it fake cp is a gross exaggeration

        source

        • -> View More Comments