Comment on There's another NSFW instance

Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That’s gonna be an instance block from me dawg.

  Unless it’s a community dedicated to ousting and publicly shaming them, there should never ever be pedo comms. If the instance admins don’t/haven’t banned it and its active users, they’re complicit and should also be shamed.

  source

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I have contacted @lemmyposter212@fedinsfw.app, the admin, about the community. They’ve stated it doesn’t break the rules and won’t be removed.

    source

    • lemmyposter212@fedinsfw.app ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I definitely think you are misinterpreting the community. It’s not my favorite community on the site but it doesn’t break any rules, everyone posted id 18+ and it a post is even remotely questionable it’s removed.

      source

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        You should add a rule against fake pedo porn.

        source
      • dr_robotBones@reddthat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Then the rules need to change

        source
    • IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      OK that’s a definite instance block. “Pedophilia doesn’t break the rules,” like motherfucker, that makes you just as bad.

      source

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        You realize that isn’t at all what is happening, right?

        source
      • Nastybutler@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        That’s literally the opposite of what was said.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Well, there goes another NSFW Lemmy instance.

    source
  • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Sensitive Content

    Nah, Mr Grail is exagerating for attention. It's more "petite 18yo who looks 16yo", not "9yo getting abused" (obviously).

    source
• panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Huh? Is there more on this, or is this just a blanket “anti-porn” stance?

  source

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    !fauxbait@fedinsfw.app is for pictures of adult women who look like teenagers. The intended purpose of the community is for pedophiles to pretend to get off to pictures of kids.

    source

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This is the adorableporn situation all over again.

      If a verifiable adult looks young, what’s the issue?

      Imagine being told your body is so controversial that you’re not allowed to post pictures of it.

      source

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        The issue is that they’re marketing to pedophiles. If they marketed those same sex workers to people who are attracted exclusively to adults, I would have no problem.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Oh, gross. I’m not going to click that… Is there a way to block communities on lemmy without opening them?

      source