Comment on Public health advocates say more transparency needed in debate over illicit tobacco as industry links questioned

<- View Parent
MisterFrog@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

Sorry I should have been clearer. I agree the addiction is insidious.

However, making it prohibitively expensive I would argue is part of the reason smoking rates plummeted, as well as no indoor smoking and other smoking restrictions.

I’m only arguing that the illicit trade has been allowed to bloom, and that the black market could be massively curbed with actual enforcement.

And I’m being incredibly sarcastic because there’s often someone coming out of the internet woodwork to say that taxing tobacco isn’t effective.

That, there are people out there who think smoking is nice, which I think is really dumb, because the high really, really isn’t worth the cancer.

I totally get it’s very addictive and if you’ve started, it’s very hard to stop, and I sympathize with those people. Only having a go at the people who argue for removing the high taxes, and that smoking is a “personal choice”.

source
Sort:hotnewtop