I vote for a universal shutdown for anyone who starts discussing harmful topics… But you’re right, that is pretty unrealistic. Government regulation is either going to be non-existent, or based on non-existent dangers made up by AI CEOs
Comment on Instagram says it will notify parents if teens ‘repeatedly’ search for terms related to suicide
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 hours agoYeah, I hate that our only two realistic options are allowing companies to self-regulate or age verification, but age verification feels like the lesser of two evils. We’d need to see much more immediate and catastrophic effects for the government to force social media companies to give up their algorithms and actually moderate without using imprecise LLM’s and automods.
XLE@piefed.social 16 hours ago
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
I could get behind this.
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
Bullshit. Tell me one reason why can’t a gocernment decide that the algorithm is bad and let the company choose in removing the algorithm or become banned in that country.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 16 hours ago
Forcing people to give their picture to Peter Thiel is not regulation. Age verification laws are giving companies more licence to abuse users, not less.
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Respectfully, I’ve heard all the arguments and do not care to litigate it again.
What you and I think is immaterial. These are the only realistic outcomes in the current ecosystem. You can go have pointless arguments about it with someone else.
Typhoon@lemmy.ca 14 hours ago
Feyd@programming.dev 15 hours ago
If you don’t want to discuss something just don’t respond lol