The Japanese government was already willing to surrender.
Comment on AIs can’t stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulations
KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 1 day agoAyo do me a favor and chart the long term health effects of being vaporized by a nuclear bomb at hiroshima vs years of agent orange/abandoned minefields/ abandoned chemical and munitions storage somewhere like Vietnam circa 1970.
Please show how the nukes are worse.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 day ago
KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
It was willing to accept a conditional surrender, which was not an offer on the table. The options were unconditional surrender or invasion and pacification. The projected cost in lives of that operation was in the millions. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined didn’t even kill 1/10th of those projections.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 8 hours ago
Their only condition was that they wanted to keep the Emperor. It was ridiculous of the Allies to demand a wholly conditional surrender. All those people got blown up just to win the argument about that one point. They could have ran a conventional air bombing campaign against tactical targets, but they decided to drop nukes on a “tactical” target in the middle of a huge city! And then they did it again! That’s not tactical, that’s strategic. If you’re going to use nukes, at least use them on a military base far away from cities.
Zombie@feddit.uk 1 day ago
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41144264/
cambridge.org/…/61689AD5A1AA4A684B84DFA4F9E5D1D3
large.stanford.edu/courses/2024/ph241/bennett1/
icrc.org/…/hiroshima-nagasaki-health-consequences…
KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Unfortunately I’m going to have to grade you as an F on this project. You have only completed half the assignment. Great job cherrypucking your research though! I see a bright future in business and marketing for you!
5/10
athatet@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
And your sources are? Where? Your ass?
KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
My source is my own post where I asked for a comparison between the health effects of the bombing of Hiroshima vs the contamination of half of a Vietnam war. The answer i reviewed only explored the health effects of the hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. That’s half of the assignment. Less, actually, when you consider the comparison between the two was the entire point to begin with.
Did that answer your question or should I try again with a crayon diagram?