Comment on FCC details plan to restore the net neutrality rules repealed by Ajit Pai
ZMonster@lemmy.world 1 year agoall the things that folks warned would happen without net neutrality hasn’t happened.
I don’t think that’s fair at all. Since we have never really had NN, then I would ask you to define what it is first. If you say that NN prevents ISPs from provisioning off websites in bundles then I would say, you’re not wrong but I massively dispute your definition of NN.
It is supposed to protect a free and open internet. I think I can safely state that. I think we can agree to that as a basis. And I can think of dozens of things that are going on right now that only serve to disarm and control users in order to strip-mine them of as much value as possible. If ISPs were utilities then you would have access to their financial reports, you could see their service reports, you would be able to know how they have and plan to allocate resources, and you would have at least transparency if not influence in decisions they choose to make that affect the cost of service. Imagine if they would have to apply for a tariff audit just to get approved to raise rates?
Are you truly arguing that this hypothetical alternate dimension is somehow imperceivably different than our own?
bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Net neutrality was never going public utilities. It’s purpose was to turn them into “common carriers,” which means they must treat all traffic equally.
ZMonster@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You’re not wrong, but your distinction is meaningless since common carriers in the US are often regulated by the same governing rules and very often the same governing bodies as public utilities.
bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I do not believe that is correct.
brookings.edu/…/regulating-internet-service-provi…
That gives a better, more thorough explanation of what the FCC is aiming to do. While public utilities are governed by regulations much like a common carrier is, it won’t result in what you were stating in your original comment (i.e. the same level of internal transparency that public utilities must comply with).