Comment on Xbox’s leadership shift proves it: the gamer era is over, AI runs the show now

<- View Parent
Abundance114@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

and only through Steam

Now you’re being a bit unfair by bundling together console hardware and software while keeping PC hardware and software separate.

To be fair you would need to take into account every available piece of software to make the determination if those features were available for PC before, at the same time, or after consoles.

If I had to guess I’d say that in 90% of cases the innovation occured on PC due to it being an open ecosystem with freely available development hardware and higher numbers of developers. Big successful companies generally don’t come up with big new good ideas, they steal them from other products that have already been proven.

But let’s just looks at this differently. In 2004 the Microsoft video game division reported profits of 2.75 billion. The Xbox live service reported 750,000 subscribers each paying $50 a year, or $37,500,000. The absence of Xbox live would have reduced Microsoft game divisions profits from 2.75 billion to 2.71 billion. Basically a rounding error. Microsoft could have easily funded any of the developments absent the subscription just as Playstation did for years later; just as PC does until this day

source
Sort:hotnewtop