And it never once turned a profit.
Not true.
Twitter was profitable at the time when that Elon guy bought it (and before, and some time after).
And it never once turned a profit.
Not true.
Twitter was profitable at the time when that Elon guy bought it (and before, and some time after).
AdamantRatPuncher@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Also you could follow actual people like artists and niche hobby groups. It had a purpose. I mean, a passable one. Not anymore
msage@programming.dev 1 year ago
‘Undermining democracy’ is still a purpose
AdamantRatPuncher@lemmy.world 1 year ago
He’s absolutely fine with that. If anything, he represents the other side of tech billionaires, the illuminated technocrat. He thinks he’s above the other social parts at a certain extent, so he’s fine with anti-democracy arguments as long as they support his view of the world, including the idea that he’s that saviour of us all, through technology, of course.