And it never once turned a profit.
Not true.
Twitter was profitable at the time when that Elon guy bought it (and before, and some time after).
And it never once turned a profit.
Not true.
Twitter was profitable at the time when that Elon guy bought it (and before, and some time after).
AdamantRatPuncher@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Also you could follow actual people like artists and niche hobby groups. It had a purpose. I mean, a passable one. Not anymore
msage@programming.dev 11 months ago
‘Undermining democracy’ is still a purpose
AdamantRatPuncher@lemmy.world 11 months ago
He’s absolutely fine with that. If anything, he represents the other side of tech billionaires, the illuminated technocrat. He thinks he’s above the other social parts at a certain extent, so he’s fine with anti-democracy arguments as long as they support his view of the world, including the idea that he’s that saviour of us all, through technology, of course.