How can they benefit from innovation that has been stifled?
If the innovation is a more efficient way to your toe
Comment on My phone, iPad, and laptop finally all use the same USB-C charger. The galaxy is at peace.
deHaga@feddit.uk 7 hours agoI’m not saying don’t regulate.
I would much rather have the government stiffle innovation if that means that consumer are safe and benefit from said innovation.
How can they benefit from innovation that has been stifled?
Greg@lemmy.ca 7 hours ago
deHaga@feddit.uk 6 hours ago
Stifled innovation means a loss of competitive advantage.
Greg@lemmy.ca 6 hours ago
Clearly you work for the “big toe stub” industry
Croquette@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
Stifle wasn’t the right word. Sorry about that, I wrote my comment too fast amd English isn’t my first language.
Innovation isn’t an all or nothing thing.
There is a difference between removing all the red tape and saying “fuck it” and making sure that the said innovation isn’t outright dangerous. If we need to take thing slower to make sure that people aren’t killed directly or indirectly, then so be it.
deHaga@feddit.uk 4 hours ago
That’s not what people like Draghi think.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draghi_report
Croquette@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
If we burn the planet for more economic productivity, we made more money but made human life worst.
So what is the point of economic productivity if it makes our everyday live worst?
deHaga@feddit.uk 3 hours ago
It needs to be sustainable obviously