Comment on Judge scolds Mark Zuckerberg's team for wearing Meta glasses to social media trial

totesmygoat@piefed.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Read the article.

  Judge ordered no cameras in the court, and even if they were allowed, why would a judge allow one party to bring their own cameras that have facial recognition capabilities?

  Camera in courtrooms are for transparency with the public, not for the defense to get facial scans of jurors and witnesses.

  source

  • totesmygoat@piefed.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    All it said was. Cameras not allowed unless the judge says so. not that this judge didn’t allow. And a judge being petty as a way of letting a billionaire get away with anything they want is pretty on point for the American justice system.

    source

    • RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      The use of recording devices and cameras is generally banned in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

      Directly from the article.

      source

      • totesmygoat@piefed.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        “Judicial officers have the discretion to place limitations on video recording and photography in their courtroom,”

        source
• XLE@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  According to the articles I read, sure doesn’t seem like it. ironic, I know. The articles we’re getting are made by journalists who are listening and writing down what they see.

  source