According to the articles I read, sure doesn’t seem like it. ironic, I know. The articles we’re getting are made by journalists who are listening and writing down what they see.
Comment on Judge scolds Mark Zuckerberg's team for wearing Meta glasses to social media trial
totesmygoat@piefed.ca 19 hours ago
Wait, sorry for my ignorance. But wasn’t this televised?
XLE@piefed.social 19 hours ago
RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today 18 hours ago
Read the article.
Judge ordered no cameras in the court, and even if they were allowed, why would a judge allow one party to bring their own cameras that have facial recognition capabilities?
Camera in courtrooms are for transparency with the public, not for the defense to get facial scans of jurors and witnesses.
totesmygoat@piefed.ca 18 hours ago
All it said was. Cameras not allowed unless the judge says so. not that this judge didn’t allow. And a judge being petty as a way of letting a billionaire get away with anything they want is pretty on point for the American justice system.
RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today 18 hours ago
Directly from the article.
totesmygoat@piefed.ca 18 hours ago
“Judicial officers have the discretion to place limitations on video recording and photography in their courtroom,”