Comment on Instagram boss: 16 hours of daily use is not addiction
XLE@piefed.social 3 days agolol you missed the duplicate the first time, yet another sign of your illiteracy. And you ignored it, typical of the belligerent hypocrite… But tell us, o wise one, what “authority” do you feel was appealed to?
Analog@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
Did not miss it just thought you were lazy, and I was right. You’ve never even heard of logical fallacies, have you?
Quick review: I fully understand your point, as demonstrated by you not correcting me, despite being repeatedly challenged to do so. You think you understand mine, but do not. And never have. Which is why you’re so full of yourself here. Again, laughably so.
You couldn’t argue your way out of a paper bag. Proof: this discussion. You don’t even know which way is up.
I do appreciate the fun though.
XLE@piefed.social 3 days ago
Wrong, I called you wrong already, you weird liar.
Your fault, even if I assume you might be right.
Genuinely, are you mentally well? I asked you what authority you think I’m appealing to. Am I speaking to a person or an LLM?
Analog@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
Oh my sweet summer child logicallyfallacious.com/…/Appeal-to-Authority
XLE@piefed.social 3 days ago
What is the name of the authority you think o used? Look at the examples in the link you posted.
Do I have to draw a picture for you, o smart one?