Imagine trying to argue that Rhodesia still exists and expecting anyone to take you seriously
Which countries have partitioned and taken over the land of Rhodesia and South Africa? You can show me on the map.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 days ago
Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 days ago
Are you saying that Aliens stole it and placed Zimbabwe in its place…?
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 days ago
I hope you understand that playing semantic calvinball doesn’t actually convince anyone
Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 days ago
I hope you understand that you being completely out of arguments is evident here.
LeninWeave@lemmy.ml 6 days ago
Zimbabwe.
Post-apartheid South Africa.
A map highlighting the two countries mentioned above.
Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 days ago
I’m sorry, are you a disabled person? Or did you forget the point you guys were trying to make?
Rhodesia changed its government and name.
South Africa changed its government.
No third parties partitioned the lands of either.
Your examples are advocating for my approach of punishing the leadership and giving the people a fresh start.
LeninWeave@lemmy.ml 6 days ago
Damn, I can really feel how tempted you were to use the r-slur there. Not surprising that a zionist and a colonialist would also be an ableist.
Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 days ago
You do that a lot, don’t you? Imagine things about people you disagree with and then assume they’re true.
I’m imagining third parties? You just stated that Palestinians are Israelis, mate. To the Israelis (and their nation), Palestinians are the third party (and the other way around).
You really are having trouble grasping simple concepts.
Hamas’ stated eradication of Israel = genocide.
The removal of Israel’s government, reform, security guarantees towards Palestine = not genocide.
I thought this was relatively simple to get.