And what does that have to do with people removing peoples posts calling for more violence?
Because Palestinians have the legal right under UN law to struggle against their occupiers by any means necessary, including armed struggle, while Israel, as an occupier, has no right to “self defense.”
You know that was hasbara, right? Previously:
conflation of state and people that Hamass ideology clearly makes
A Document of General Principles and Policies
by largely targeting and slaughtering civilians in their homes
That is not what happened. That is what Western media said happened.
- The Intercept:
- Al Jazeera: Why did Israel deploy Hannibal Directive, allowing killing of own citizens?
- Electronic Intifada: How Israel killed hundreds of its own people on 7 October
If Hamas wants to dismantle Israeli oppression through activism, negotiations, and political reform great.
- It has tried to do that for decades. The most recent significant attempt was Great March of Return, wherein the IDF slaughtered Gazans.
agentant@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
The people are calling for Palestinian self-defense against the apartheid state intent on their genocide. The two aren’t comparable forms of violence.
einkorn@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
There is a difference between calling for self-defense, calling for killings and supporting Hamas killing civilians.
JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
The users here have even less critical thinking ability than Reddit, and I didn’t think that were possible. More than one thing can be bad at the same time, but apparently you have to pick teams here and then call for death to the other team. Lemmy is a fucking parody now.
mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
smithsonianmag.com/…/gruesome-story-hannah-duston…
please note the similarities to pissrahelli hasbara and indigenous resistance in palestine.