Comment on Instagram boss: 16 hours of daily use is not addiction
Analog@lemmy.ml 5 days agoYou support lying. Good to know.
If you don’t understand the tomato comment, no wonder you’re having so much trouble with the interpretation and lying topics!
XLE@piefed.social 5 days ago
There’s no way you can say that the inquiry was about tomatoes as much as it was about addiction. Not without being incredibly stupid or incredibly dishonest.
You are now intentionally leaving out multiple paragraphs of content that would prove the opposite, which adds to your deception.
Demonstrate a grain of honesty by fixing your lies and maybe you’ll have a right to talk.
Analog@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
You really don’t understand and are just driving the point home the more you post. I feel kinda sorry for you.
XLE@piefed.social 5 days ago
Please defend your use of your lying false equivalency. Demonstrate your wisdom, Truth Seeker.
Analog@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
What do you think my original point was?
Yours was essentially “it doesn’t matter if he said addiction or not, he was dodging the question. All the evidence points towards him claiming that much usage is not an addiction.”