Comment on Texas Republican Primary having a normal one
BillyClark@piefed.social 2 days ago
“NO religious freedom,” so let’s ban that religion? Every religion believes theirs is correct.
“Women brutalized” “Slavery allowed” “Child marriage & rape” These things are already illegal from our other laws.
“Girl genital mutilation” I think this one is already illegal, as well.
“No pet dogs allowed” First of all, wut? But second of all, I’d love to see some Texas politician try to pass a law that outlawed pet dogs. They’d probably get shot to death by the other politicians before they left the chamber.
“BAN SHARIA NOW!” BAN MARTIANS NOW! BAN FISH RIDING BICYCLES NOW! BAN ADULTS FROM SEEING WHY KIDS LOVE CINNAMON TOAST CRUNCH NOW! BAN LICKING UNTIL YOU GET TO THE TOOTSIE ROLL CENTER OF A TOOTSIE POP NOW!
BAN POLITICIANS WHO WASTE OUR TIME WITH MEANINGLESS LAWS AND CULTURE WARS NOW!
Child marriage and rape (within marriage) are legal in far too many US States.
Slavery is allowed in far too many US States.
Brutalizing women (if you consider things like revocation of bodily autonomy or incarceration for miscarriages) is legal in far too many US States. If you consider unpunished crimes against women, though illegal, it is far too common in many US States.
Many landlords forbid having pets and there’s little to no recourse for pets killed by the state.
Also these are laws that Christians insisted were fundamental for their religion in our country’s past. Hell, some still say that.
tomiant@piefed.social 2 days ago
From a purely argumentative standpoint, that doesn’t mean that one of them isn’t. Again, strictly from a rhetorical point of view.
From a rhetorical point of view, strictly, one could say, if one were to defend the statement, which I’m not*, but one *could*, *hypothetically say that any religion actively espousing those things is worthy of condemnation regardless of our laws.
Same goes for this. Hypothetically.
Yeah I don’t know either. Even hypothetically.
No notes.