*hards on
Comment on Instagram boss: 16 hours of daily use is not addiction
lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 2 weeks agoHe’s right. Clinical addiction has nothing to do with how much you do something, it has to do with how much it causes problems in your life. I know everyone on Lemmy is tripping over their own hard ons to kill corporations, but there are people using lemmy 16 hours a day and if laws are passed to fight Internet addiction, they will not specifically target corporations. We all go down together. Just ask the creator of Urban Dead.
frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
So someone doing Heroin everday is not addicted if it doesn’t cause any problems in life? Clinical Addiction absolutely does have to do with how much you do something (and other factors of course).
lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s a physical addiction. Drug addiction is a problem physicians handle. Psychologists handle addiction to video games, gambling, sex, the Internet, etc and that’s how they define addiction.
mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
That is simply not correct. It is true that addiction to substances ends in physical dependency. But at its core all addiction is psychological. A heroin addict doesn’t relapse after two years of being sober because he’s still physically addicted to it. In most cases it’s about missing the capacity for emotional regulation. And people addicted to substances don’t get treated by physicians, at least where I’m from.
lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It is correct. If you do heroin everyday, you will have physical problems. If you stop playing Team Fortress 2 and it causes you to start shaking, vomiting, and shitting your pants, then that’s comparable to heroin. But you won’t do that so they’re not the same types of addiction. That’s why the medical community defines addiction by how something affects your life and not by some arbitrary number of times you do it.
CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I guess we could chalk it up to bad journalism because the example was purely anecdotal. It‘s frustrating for sure.