Comment

Comment on Tesla Robotaxis Reportedly Crashing at a Rate That's 4x Higher Than Humans

T156@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Even if they were, would it not be better to give the car better senses?

Humans don’t have LIDAR because we can’t just hook something into a human’s brain and have it work. If you can do that with a self-driving car, why cut it down to human senses?

source

Sort:hotnew top

48954246@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Exactly, with this logic why have motors or wheels?

You don’t have wheels so you shouldn’t use cars

source
- itsathursday@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Image
  
  youtu.be/A-RfHC91Ewc
  
  source
ageedizzle@piefed.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I agree it would be better. I’m just saying that in theory cameras are all that would be required to achieve human level performance, so long as the AI was capable enough

source
- embed_me@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  “So long as the AI has the same intelligence as a human brain” is a pretty big assumption. That assumption is in sci-fi territory.
  
  source
  - ageedizzle@piefed.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Yeah thats my point
    
    source
- Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Except humans have self cleaning lenses. Cars don’t.
  
  source
- AtrusOfDni@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Except if I get something to replace me, it better do better than me, not just just as good. So I would expect better sensors.
  
  source