I agree it would be better. I’m just saying that in theory cameras are all that would be required to achieve human level performance, so long as the AI was capable enough
Comment on Tesla Robotaxis Reportedly Crashing at a Rate That's 4x Higher Than Humans
T156@lemmy.world 16 hours agoEven if they were, would it not be better to give the car better senses?
Humans don’t have LIDAR because we can’t just hook something into a human’s brain and have it work. If you can do that with a self-driving car, why cut it down to human senses?
ageedizzle@piefed.ca 16 hours ago
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 8 hours ago
Except humans have self cleaning lenses. Cars don’t.
embed_me@programming.dev 15 hours ago
“So long as the AI has the same intelligence as a human brain” is a pretty big assumption. That assumption is in sci-fi territory.
ageedizzle@piefed.ca 9 hours ago
Yeah thats my point
48954246@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Exactly, with this logic why have motors or wheels?
You don’t have wheels so you shouldn’t use cars