Comment on Lawyers increasingly have to convince clients that AI chatbots give bad advice

• ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  But planes don’t routinely spit out false information.

  source

  • a4ng3l@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    If you can’t fly a plane chances are you’ll crash it. If you can’t use llms chances are you’ll get shit out of it… outcome of using a tool is directly correlated to one’s ability?

    Sound logical enough to me.

    source

    • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Sure. However, the outcome of the tool LLM always looks very likely. And if you aren‘t a subject matter expert the likely expected result looks very right. That‘s the difference - hard to spot the wrong things (even for experts)

      source

      • a4ng3l@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        So is a speedometer and an altimeter until you reaaaaaaaaly need to understand them.

        I mean it all boils down to proper tool with proper knowledge and ability. It’s slightly exacerbated by the apparent simplicity but if you look at it as a tool it’s no different.

        source
    • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Except with a plane, if you know how to fly it you’re far less likely to crash it. Even if you “can use LLMs” there’s still a pretty strong chance you’re going to get shit back due to its very nature. One the machine works with you, the other the machine is always working against you.

      source

      • a4ng3l@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Nha that’s just plain wrong…also you can also fantastically screw flying a plane but so long you use LLMs safely you’re golden.

        It also has no will on its own; it is not « working against you ». Don’t give those apps a semblance of intent.

        source

        • -> View More Comments