Comment

Comment on Lawyers increasingly have to convince clients that AI chatbots give bad advice

It’s been doing wonders to help me improve materials I produce so that they fit better to some audiences. Also I can use those to spot missing points / inconsistencies against the ton of documents we have in my shop when writing something. It’s quite useful when using it as a sparing partner so far.

source

Sort:hotnew top

mech@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Rule of thumb is that AI can be useful if you use it for things you already know.
They can save time and if they produce shit, you’ll notice.
Don’t use them for things you know nothing about.

source
- a4ng3l@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  LLM’s specifically bc ai as a range of practices encompass a lot of things where the user can be slightly more dumb.
  
  You’re spot on in my opinion.
  
  source
The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
It’s great when you have basic critical thinking skills.

Unfortunately, many people don’t have those and just use AI as a substitute for their own brain.

source
- a4ng3l@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Yeah well same applies for a lot of tools… I’m not certified for flying a plane and look at me not flying one either… but I’m not shitting on planes…
  
  source
  - ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    But planes don’t routinely spit out false information.
    
    source
    a4ng3l@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    If you can’t fly a plane chances are you’ll crash it. If you can’t use llms chances are you’ll get shit out of it… outcome of using a tool is directly correlated to one’s ability?
    
    Sound logical enough to me.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Rearranging text is a vastly different use case than diagnosis and relevant information retrieval

source