Comment on Amazon Wins $6 Million in Damages Against Pirated DVD Stores, Plus Domain Takeovers

• paraphrand@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  No, but they shouldn’t be allowed to sue for physical piracy on products they do not produce physically.

  This is nonsense.

  source

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    For gaming, lets say you have a title region locked to Japan but someone sells an unlocked pirated version.

    Should they be able to sue for a product variant they very well could make but are choosing not to?

    There’s the whole “no harm” rule, if they aren’t being harmed by selling to people who are not and never will be their customers…

    source

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I don’t think someone has the right to sell someone else’s product without permission. It’s as simple as that.

      Note that this is differentiated from piracy. Y’all are muddying waters and sabotaging the cause when you entertain the idea that selling bootleg dvds should be equivalent to someone downloading something from the internet with no money changing hands.

      source

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        Can it really be an infringement if there’s no physical source though? That’s the question.

        Say someone does an online comic strip, I download the images, re-format them for print, and sell a print version.

        There is no physical version to bootleg, the only reason a physical copy exists at all is because I put the time and effort into making one.

        Same with the “Calvin peeing on things” car stickers. King Features and Bill Watterson could absolutely produce those themselves, but don’t. Watterson refuses to license the character for anything.

        At the same time, they also haven’t gone after the people who are producing them.

        source