Comment on Amazon Wins $6 Million in Damages Against Pirated DVD Stores, Plus Domain Takeovers
paraphrand@lemmy.world 5 weeks agoSo, companies should be legally forced to produce DVDs?
Forcing the copyright holder to sell on DVD would be problematic. Why not just permit others to offer it in a format that is apprently in demand (e.g. by reducing copyright to 5 years, instead of ~5 billion)?
Pirating is indeed one thing (on boats… stealing, with violence and murder). If you say “unauthorised copying” instead of using the music industry’s propaganda term then maybe nuance is easier to see.
So, companies should be legally forced to produce DVDs?
I will admit forcing a form factor is ill advised, but it should be possible to purchase a legal and permanent copy of said production in one form or another. Even if that is digitally, so long as it can be downloaded and doesn’t need some sort of online/phone home solution to play it.
I always try to pay for my media in whatever way supports the creators the best.
But if Amazon won’t sell the format I’m buying, I’ll gladly pay someone who will. And laws made by Amazon soley for Amazon’s benefit do not obligate me to become some kind of detective when I buy a DVD.
So no one should force Amazon to produce DVDs, but Amazon shouldn’t be able to stop others from producing what they refuse to produce. There’s already laws about abandoned products that could be applied.
This is just Amazon using their money to be a bully.
This whole thing wouldn’t be an issue if copyright was a reasonable length, like 5 years.
jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
No, but they shouldn’t be allowed to sue for physical piracy on products they do not produce physically.
paraphrand@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
This is nonsense.
jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
For gaming, lets say you have a title region locked to Japan but someone sells an unlocked pirated version.
Should they be able to sue for a product variant they very well could make but are choosing not to?
There’s the whole “no harm” rule, if they aren’t being harmed by selling to people who are not and never will be their customers…
paraphrand@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I don’t think someone has the right to sell someone else’s product without permission. It’s as simple as that.
Note that this is differentiated from piracy. Y’all are muddying waters and sabotaging the cause when you entertain the idea that selling bootleg dvds should be equivalent to someone downloading something from the internet with no money changing hands.