Unfortunately my ISP doesn’t support IPv6 yet, both for the public internet and for my local network.
Comment on Is it feasible to run a TURN server behind NAT?
thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Ipv6, get an ipv6. There is not nat in ipv6
hackysphere@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Seems like a very reasonable reason to switch to another isp well established in the 21st century
hackysphere@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
I live in a rural area, so my only options are dealing with a mobile hotspot for everything or getting satellite internet for more than double the price.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
Have you asked? It might be worth sending a email at least.
hackysphere@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
They only seem to support it for business customers for now, not for consumer usage.
Aganim@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Have I got news for you. ☹️
thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world 2 months ago
What a lot of nonsense. Of course the technology exists and of course it can be done. But in reality is not done because it simply doesn’t bring any benefit.
And in addition a address translation is not nat ™ because the server can be hit from the outside.
Today in ipv4 we have likely 2 Nats, 1 after your router and the other by the carrier (cgnat) and ipv6 those are non existent
Aganim@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It was meant tongue-in-cheek, you seem to be taking it much more serious than I intended it to be. 🙂
Fully agree that there is absolutely no benefit to NAT66, it only causes enormous headaches. In sincerely hope nobody uses it these days, this poor bastard however did manage to find a VPS provider that used NAT66 back in 2018: blog.apnic.net/2018/02/02/nat66-good-bad-ugly/ 🤢
thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Fuck, there is a law in internet (which name I cannot recall) about the impossibility of distinguish an ironic message.
I felt in that trap completely!!
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
Don’t NAT ipv6. It is bad in so many ways.