Comment on Recreating uncensored Epstein PDFs from raw encoded attachments

• kescusay@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I’m not having trouble with it as such, it’s just a slow and painstaking process. The source is crappy enough that an enormous number of characters need to be checked manually, and it’s ridiculously time-consuming.

  source
• Taldan@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  OCR is mostly good enough. Problem here is we have 76 pages that we need to be read perfectly, with a low fidelity input

  We also have very little in the way of error correction, since it’s mostly not human readable

  source
• floofloof@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I wonder if they gave considered crowdsourcing this, having many people type in small chunks of the data by hand, doing their own character recognition? Get enough people in and enough overlap and the process would have some built-in error correction.

  source

  • apftwb@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I mean the problem is that even with human eyes it’s still really hard to tell l and 1 in that font.

    source

    • Kevlar21@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Not an expert at all but I’m genuinely curious how long it would take to check all possibilities for each I or 1? Is that the full length of the hash or whatever? So in this example image we have 2^8 =256 different possibilities to check? Seems like that would be easy enough for a computer.

      source