Comment on Generative AI and Wikipedia editing: What we learned in 2025
Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 days ago
Interesting numbers for people who dont wanna read : - on all the new contributors they taught, only ~5% were flagged by the AI detection tool. - on the AI flagged articles, only 7% presented sources that didn’t even exist. Most of the AI outputed correct statements with existing sources. - however, north of 66% of AI articles failed verification : the citations or facts could not be found in the sources provided by AI
colonelp4nic@lemmy.world 2 days ago
thanks for the relevant excerpt! One small correction: most of the AI sentences had valid and relevant cited sources, but the statements were not correct.