I’m not sure why either. He didn’t even say those things can’t exist. He just said there is no clear evidence for them yet, which is true enough.
I find Hancock entertaining, and he may even be right, but don’t find any of his evidence sufficient to support the claims he is making. That could always change, in either direction. It is fun watching new evidence emerge.
dgdft@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It’s the opposite: Most people are likely downvoting because Hancock-esque arguments aren’t worth addressing.
This is remedial choir-preaching.