Comment on System Redundancy
Cyber@feddit.uk 4 days agoGood points there.
For 1. The ISP router is a Fritz one set to bridge mode running over a PoE adapter from the same UPS the firewall is using. It stayed up all the time (looking back at the logs)
-
Not sure what happened here, but the firewall is the DNS resolver and when everything else powered back up, nothing got an IP address. Now, whether thw service failed or the WAPs took longer to start than the devices could wait, I’m not sure, but as Scotty said: it’s dead Jim.
-
Good point. I don’t need it ALL to be redundant.
-
Also good. The UPS is directly connected to the firewall (which has NUT in), but it doesn’t inform anything else… I’ll look into that too.
Nice mental reset for me about over thinking it… thanks
just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 days ago
My hunch here is that you MIGHT be using a named host as your DNS resolves instead of an IP address in your network, OR, for some reason your DNS resolves doesn’t have a static address. Never use named hosts to point to network services, and all network services need a static IP, so go and check all of that.
Cyber@feddit.uk 3 days ago
Yep, all good with DHCP vs DNS… just my grammer was terrible.
Nothing was getting an IP from the DHCP, when the wifi returned…and… DNS was also not working for the few devices that still had an IP.
Sry bout the confusion there.
just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 days ago
So then as a next step, I’d set Wireguard up on one of your regularly hosts, set it to filter for DHCP traffic, confirm you’re seeing regularly advertisements first, then reboot the device that’s responsible for DHCP and make sure it resumes sending those advertisements when it comes back.
If it’s the same device handling DNS, make sure it’s also immediately returning responses after the reboot as well with
digornslookup.towerful@programming.dev 2 days ago
Wireshark*