Oh, the historical fascisms such as under Stalin and Pol Pot, right.
it’s in principle undetermined in ideology
Correct in so far, as it‘s determined by economic system. Which happens to align with left/right ideology.
But the only principles really important for any kind of fascism are violence, anti-rationalism and amorphous ideology.
You making shit up depending on how your tummy feels, don‘t you?
Please stop using the internet.
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 8 hours ago
How to detect a commie idiot without them naming themselves.
I’m actually using Eco’s version, and he’s notably leftist.
Smart thoughts were chasing you, but you were always faster.
doben@lemmy.wtf 8 hours ago
I would have been more impressed, if you‘d actually provided argumentative content instead personal attacks.
Not sure, what you used Umberto Eco‘s definition for, but it wasn‘t to formulate a coherent thought on the topic.
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 7 hours ago
Thank you for your opinion, but for classifying Stalin and Pol Pot as fascist, at the very least. If you have actually read that definition.
vs
and
, I don’t even know, “idiot” doesn’t seem a personal attack in such a situation. Commies are the only kind of people claiming that fascism has any economic alignments, as far as I have seen.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
No, you’re not.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur-Fascism#Overview
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 hours ago
Eco’s version assumes Stalin’s regime is one of primary fascist regimes in the first place. I dunno about that overview, in the original text it’s clear from the beginning. Either you haven’t read it or you are trying to cheat.