Comment on Bears or no bears?
Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 hours agoNot intentional pray, not eating the whole thing, not stalking.
You might as well say cows then too, they are least kill more ppl.
Comment on Bears or no bears?
Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 hours agoNot intentional pray, not eating the whole thing, not stalking.
You might as well say cows then too, they are least kill more ppl.
foo@feddit.uk 2 hours ago
It was a joke. You see, I was suggesting that a place with lots of sharks might be called “Shark”, in keeping with the point of the original post.
I am aware that most shark attacks are due to mistaken identity, but it wasn’t meant to be taken too seriously.
Perhaps the reason sharks came to mind before any other animals is because I read this article a couple of days ago: standard.co.uk/…/surfer-bitten-in-half-7232230.ht…
It stands out because the way it was reported makes it sound like the sharks executed a coordinated attack on the surfer. But, again, I didn’t expect to get cross-examined on what I intended to be a humorous remark.
Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 1 hour ago
Oh, sorry! :)
I got the joke, but seeing sharks as predators to humans always makes me think of the exaggerated story from the sinking of Indianapolis (wiki/USS_Indianapolis_(CA-35)) with all manner of bs added for fun, and a subsequent money grab books & movie (wiki/Jaws_(film) that shaped entire generations minds bcs fear is so easily monetised.
Imagine being a 400 million years old species & then getting anti-propaganda from a species that live in an environment you can’t even move in (and die quickly). And they dump toxic trash all over your environment. And have been killing you en masse since the day they could.
Similar to how made-up stories & fairy tales helped kill off the wolves in Europe even before their unsustainable habitation shrinkage/separation of areas.