Comment on Federal judge again strikes down California law banning gun magazines of more than 10 rounds

• random65837@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  If your argument is that limiting magazine capacity for people not commuting crimes, has an effect on people that ignore laws and will not produce any real life result as a consequence of that, than yes, you are.

  source

  • PizzaMan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Now you’ve moved the goal posts.

    These two statements:

    • has an effect on people that ignore laws

    and

    • criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal

    are fundamentally different claims.

    source

    • random65837@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Goal posts are exactly where they’ve always been. You want the innocent hindered/punished for the crimes of criminals with laws/regulations that only apply to those who follow laws in the first place. Law that aren’t new, and have proven useless. You’re clearly not a CA resident, or a gun owner because this is elementary school simple, yet clearly over your head.

      source

      • PizzaMan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        You want the innocent hindered/punished for the crimes of criminals with laws/regulations that only apply to those who follow laws in the first place.

        That’s not what I want.

        You’re clearly not a CA resident, or a gun owner because this is elementary school simple, yet clearly over your head.

        And this is an ad hominem.

        source

        • -> View More Comments