Comment on Federal judge again strikes down California law banning gun magazines of more than 10 rounds

• PizzaMan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Give an example of how that’s a straw man

  I never said anything about any of this:

  • criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal

  Or this:

  • I’ll bet speed limits and DUI laws stop people too right?

  You are arguing against a position I do not hold, and thus a strawman.

  source

  • random65837@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    If your argument is that limiting magazine capacity for people not commuting crimes, has an effect on people that ignore laws and will not produce any real life result as a consequence of that, than yes, you are.

    source

    • PizzaMan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Now you’ve moved the goal posts.

      These two statements:

      • has an effect on people that ignore laws

      and

      • criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal

      are fundamentally different claims.

      source

      • random65837@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Goal posts are exactly where they’ve always been. You want the innocent hindered/punished for the crimes of criminals with laws/regulations that only apply to those who follow laws in the first place. Law that aren’t new, and have proven useless. You’re clearly not a CA resident, or a gun owner because this is elementary school simple, yet clearly over your head.

        source

        • -> View More Comments