You’re reading words on a screen either way.
Who do you think is a better source:
- An unverified, inaccurate, low effort, and low quality idiot 😁
- or Britannica?
Unless you mean something else that I’m not receiving.
You’re reading words on a screen either way.
Who do you think is a better source:
Unless you mean something else that I’m not receiving.
noretus@crazypeople.online 1 week ago
I appreciate that you seem to think that my brain is any better than that an low-effort and low quality idiot but it’s not.
The neurotransmitter person gave a quite confident account about the nature of attention and nature of human psychology. They clearly felt it was relevant to the point I was making. Surely someone like this has an university level degree in the subject and isn’t just a random computer nerd who occasionally consumes some pop-science content online. It makes more sense to me to dip into their reservoir of knowledge instead of making a feeble attempt at reading some AI Summary on the topic.
Mac@mander.xyz 1 week ago
I was referring to myself as the alternative. But yes, maybe they’ll explain it well.
I’ll yield to them.