Comment on Chinese propaganda is rampant on the fediverse
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks agoSo you see how people react to that and go wow that person wants <insert country here> to be able to kill civilians?
Especially after saying and I quote
Yes it’s okay as long as it’s a legal order. And there are plenty of legal targets in Moscow and St. Petersburg.
it’s fine if a legal order?
realitista@lemmus.org 2 weeks ago
If you want to give an example of what an .ml mindfuck and ban is like, congrats you have succeeded.
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
This is literally what was removed and the entire argument/question. Do you think people are okay targets if in wrong country, and it’s yes.
Again it was if it’s a legal order is it okay for them to kill people or civilians and you said yes. But now that you see it you’re not too no I totally meant not if being specifically targeted, but it’s fine if they’re collateral
Like fuck how does this keep happening, especially from the ones calling ml a shit hole
realitista@lemmus.org 2 weeks ago
I think we have a misunderstanding. I meant legal by international law. It is not legal by international law to target civilians. So no, I do not think it’s okay to target civilians, full stop.
But yes this is very much how .ml feels. Twisting words to achieve some sort of propaganda win. Excellent job there.
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
Yes we have a misunderstanding, but not the definition of law.
Again not twisting any words. This is why most think ml does censorship. They come in, say terrible things and when comment removed or banned call foul.
This is what a 10+ comment deep thread and you still can’t admit why anyone would think it was poor wording